Skip to main content

Vanilla Options on Top of HIP-4

· 6 min read
Hypercall Research
Options Market Analysis

HIP-4 extends way beyond prediction markets. We are building real vanilla options on Hypercall with native HIP-4 thresholds underneath them and portfolio margin that can finally credit the whole writer hedge stack.

Coming Soon
Real vanilla options,
built on HIP-4.
We are building a new writer stack for Hypercall: real calls and puts on top, perps for delta, HIP-4 threshold markets for convexity, and portfolio margin that can finally credit the whole hedge book.
Product
Real uncapped calls and puts
Hedge layer
Perps + HIP-4 thresholds
Margin
Scenario-based PM credit
Writer Stack
1
Real option
The instrument the user trades
2
Perp hedge
Linear delta control
3
HIP-4 ladder
Strike-local convexity
4
PM engine
Credits only real improvement

A HIP-4 threshold is a tradeable boundary. Stack enough of them and you get strike-local shape that a perp cannot provide. That is exactly what a short option writer needs underneath a real vanilla book.

What is a HIP-4 threshold?

A binary option pays a fixed amount if the underlying is above the strike at expiry, and zero otherwise. No slope, no scaling with distance. Just a yes-or-no payout at one line in the sand. That is what a HIP-4 threshold market is.

Compare it to a vanilla call:

Settlement Price$108k
$70k$140k
Vanilla callBinary (HIP-4)0102030$70kK ($100k)$140kSettlement PricePayoff
Vanilla payoff
$8k
Binary payoff
$10k
Key difference
Vanilla grows with distance. Binary is flat at $10k.

The vanilla call grows with distance above the strike. The binary is flat: above the line you get 1, below you get 0. One threshold is not a full option. It is one tradeable boundary.

HIP-4 is a general outcome-trading framework, but the canonical configuration people are already building on is European-style 1-day binary options on BTC and HYPE: the oracle checks spot at a fixed resolution time and posts 0 or 1. That is the exact form the writer hedge math in this article assumes. Stratium's native HIP-4 interface and heat.fi both list 1-day BTC binaries on Hyperliquid testnet.

What HIP-4 actually is
A HIP-4 market is a threshold at expiry. One line in the sand. If the condition is true, one side pays 1. If the condition is false, the other side pays 1.
Example Market
“Will BTC settle above 100,000 at June expiry?”
YES token
Pays 1 if BTC settles above 100k
If YES trades at 0.37, the buyer pays 0.37 now for something that becomes either 1.00 or 0.00 at expiry.
NO token
Pays 1 if BTC does not settle above 100k
If YES trades at 0.37, NO will trade around 0.63 before fees and microstructure effects.
Settlement Read
If BTC settles at 104kYES = 1.00, NO = 0.00
If BTC settles at 97kYES = 0.00, NO = 1.00
Why Hypercall caresIt is not a vanilla option. It is a clean strike-local payout that a short option writer can use under the book.

The live market already prices this

This is not a hypothetical. Here is a real snapshot from April 9, 2026, BTC at $72,263 (Deribit index). Three markets, same underlying, same strike region.

StrikeDistanceDeribit callDeribit IVImplied P(ITM)Polymarket YES
75k+3.8%$1,25341%~27%69¢
80k+10.7%$30541%~10%24¢
85k+17.6%$7944%~4%7.3¢
90k+24.5%$2848%~2%3.1¢
100k+38.4%$1061%~0.5%0.6¢
Deribit call
What a real vanilla call costs at each strike. The price falls fast as strikes move further OTM.
The option market's expected move. Rises from 41% at 75k to 61% at 100k: that is skew showing up as fatter-tail pricing further OTM.
Implied P(ITM)
Deribit's view of the probability BTC finishes above each strike at expiry. This is what a HIP-4 threshold would price at.
Polymarket YES
What the market pays today for a yes-at-any-touch contract. Higher than the at-expiry probability because any touch counts.

Read it this way: the Deribit implied probability column is what a HIP-4 threshold would trade at, because HIP-4 is European-style (checks spot at a fixed time). The Polymarket column is what a one-touch contract at the same strike charges, which is a different question. Both are decaying the same way as strikes get further from spot, because they are pricing the same underlying world.

Two things jump out:

1. The vol market and the threshold market agree on shape. IV rises from 41% to 61% and implied probabilities drop from 27% to 0.5%. Both are saying the probability of crossing these levels decays fast but never reaches zero. That decay curve is what a short call writer has to hedge beyond their perp.

2. A vanilla call captures the whole curve. A binary captures one slice. An 85k call pays the full (S − 85k) at expiry. An 85k binary pays a flat 1. Both are useful: the vanilla is the product the writer sells, the binary is the building block underneath.

If Hypercall were listing a real April BTC call with a strike around 85k, the writer stack writes itself: the vanilla option on top, a long BTC perp for linear direction, and a strip of upside thresholds around 75k, 80k, 85k, 90k for strike-local shape. HIP-4 brings the threshold leg on-platform.

From one threshold to a ladder

One threshold is not enough. A short call writer who sold the 100k strike cares about 100k, then 110k, then 120k. The natural hedge object is a ladder. This is the mechanic behind static replication: a call can be decomposed into a portfolio of binaries held to expiry with no rebalancing.

Replication sketch
A vanilla call can be read as a strip of thresholds.
Vanilla call
HIP-4 ladder
Residual tail
Vanilla call versus HIP-4 threshold ladder payoffPayoff chart comparing a vanilla call (blue line, diagonal above the strike) with a HIP-4 threshold ladder (green staircase stepping up at each rung). The red shaded region shows the uncovered tail where the call keeps climbing past the top rung but the ladder is flat.02040608010080100120140160180200strike KFinal underlying pricePayoffuncovered tail
The red region is what the ladder cannot cover. Between the steps, the staircase overshoots or undershoots. Above the last threshold, the call keeps going but the ladder is flat. That gap is the residual tail that must stay margined.

The ladder starts to approximate the call payoff, but a finite set of thresholds cannot capture uncapped upside. The tail above the highest rung always remains.

The stack we are building

The Thesis
Build the vanilla product on top.
Put HIP-4 in the writer stack below it.
The listed instrument stays a real option. The change is under the hood, the hedge inventory gets better and the margin engine gets a cleaner view of the book.
1. PRODUCT LAYERHypercall lists the real optionBuyer sees a vanilla call or put, not a bounded market.2. HEDGE LAYERHIP-4 ladder replicates the callThe staircase tracks the call payoff until the top rung. The tail past the last rung stays uncovered.3. PM LAYERMargin scores the combined bookCredit only the part of the hedge that actually improves the stress loss.KKuncoveredcallladdertailPERP ONLYPERP + HIP-4

Walk through a concrete example: a writer sells a BTC June 100k call, hedges with a perp and a threshold ladder, and carries the residual tail.

One real option, one writer book
A user buys a BTC June 100k call. The listed product stays vanilla. Underneath it, the writer carries a perp, a threshold ladder, and a residual tail that still needs margin.
Book Setup
Listed optionBTC June 100k call
DirectionPerp hedge
Strike region100k / 110k / 120k thresholds
What stays openResidual tail above the ladder
Scenario Map
SpotCall stateWhat helpsWhat remains
95kMostly out of the moneyPerp does most of the workThreshold ladder is mostly inactive
102kStarts to turn on100k threshold becomes relevantThis is where a perp alone feels incomplete
112kCall is live100k and 110k thresholds are activeThe hedge starts to pick up strike shape
130kDeep in the moneyLadder helps, tail remainsResidual upside is still uncapped and must stay margined

What changes when HIP-4 enters PM

There are two portfolio margin engines in the picture, and the distinction matters.

Hypercall PM scores the options book. It runs scenario-based stress tests on vanilla calls and puts to compute the writer's required margin. This is the engine documented in Hypercall Portfolio Margin.

Hyperliquid PM scores HyperCore positions: perps today, and per Hyperliquid's portfolio margin docs, future HyperCore asset classes including HIP-4. This is the protocol-level engine that governs HyperCore-native assets.

Today these run independently. A writer's vanilla options sit in Hypercall PM's stress test. The perp hedge sits in Hyperliquid PM's stress test. Neither engine sees the other side of the book, so neither can credit the hedge.

💡

The direction we are taking: Hypercall PM reads HyperCore positions directly. The perp and the HIP-4 threshold ladder get pulled into the same stress test as the vanilla options, inside Hypercall's engine. The writer's options book becomes the unified view. Hyperliquid PM continues to govern HyperCore assets at the protocol level; Hypercall PM layers on top, reading those positions into its own scenario grid to price the combined stack.

Once Hypercall PM sees the perp, the threshold ladder, and the vanilla liability in the same stress test, the writer's margin requirement can reflect the actual risk rather than treating each leg in isolation.

What changes when HIP-4 enters PM
The listed option does not change. The margin engine gets a better view of the writer book.
FieldBefore HIP-4 PM supportAfter HIP-4 PM support
Listed productVanilla callSame vanilla call
Writer hedgePerpPerp + HIP-4 ladder
Strike-region hedgeOnly via other optionsNative thresholds at arbitrary levels
PM viewPartial bookCombined book
Capital effectDirection gets creditMore strike-local relief

The whole thing only works if the credit stays conservative. PM should only credit what is actually hedged.

How PM should think about the stack
Margin relief should show up where the writer book is actually safer than a perp-only hedge would imply.
ScenarioSpotPerp-only stressPerp + HIP-4Read
Below strike95k
44%
44%
The ladder is mostly inactive here.
Right around strike100k to 105k
72%
36%
This is where thresholds begin to matter.
First breakout110k to 115k
72%
28%
Multiple thresholds are active.
Far above strike130k plus
88%
60%
The ladder helps, but the tail remains.
⚠️
No fake safety

Mismatched expiries, thin ladders, gaps above the highest threshold, and residual tails the hedge does not actually cover should all stay fully margined. Better capital efficiency does not mean pretending the risk is gone.

What actually changes

Today on Hypercall, a writer already has real tools:

TodayWith HIP-4
Margin modelScenario-based PMSame scenario-based PM
Hedging short gammaPerps + other optionsPerps + other options + HIP-4 thresholds
Strike-local shapeOnly through other optionsNative thresholds at arbitrary levels
Listed productReal vanilla calls and putsSame real vanilla calls and puts
PM book viewOptions + perpsOptions + perps + threshold ladder

Nothing breaks. Everything you can do today still works. HIP-4 adds one new building block to the hedge inventory, and PM gets a richer view of the book when it is present.

What we ship first

What we will ship first
This is a sequence, not a splash page. The writer surface comes first, PM-aware ladder credit comes next, and packaging follows.
HIP-4 launch roadmap phases
PhaseDetails
Phase 1
Writer hedge visibility
HIP-4 positions show up next to perps and vanilla options in the same writer view.
Phase 2
Threshold ladder credit
When HIP-4 gets PM support, aligned ladders start earning conservative relief in the strike region.
Phase 3
One-click writer packs
Quote the option, suggest the perp plus HIP-4 stack, and preview the marginal IM before the order goes live.

Further reading

Hypercall reference

External